I address you in the light of recent memory
coverage of sensecom. You are waking us to the
ability of memory to pick up
and record,
information as a reminder of the past. The idea that
the memory, a far superior modem, for thought
needs the memory to
exist is tested.
The fading of time, the fading of memory is
dependent on an individual basis. The phasing of
detail to be manipulated by
words, emotions. and the
sense of the place at the time tests even the best
memory. The hope is that memory must used for
good use is vital. We
cannot exist in
the past without a recall or indeed a mechanism to
record time as it passes by.
The use of technology helps, but only provides a
slide, inhibited by angle and perspective, focus and
line of interest. We
must recall this.
The recall is different but might remind or indeed
help us.
What the mechanism you used was a provider, a
lack of confidence in our abilities to communicate
effectively which with
texhnology used for the
honesty of the individualism is a fader, a bright
light of place but not real details to gain from
I commend your work, a scientific study to the
usefulness of mind and technology as a human
pointer.
