The knowledge of commercialism of Design. Design
takes many forms (especially in
Graphic Design); all was to be designed on
computer. this was the answer
to the end of creativity, we struggle to utilise a tool
with answers
at no end. Was this all meant or just a click of the
button to challenge both the artist and the
computer itself?
Was this a Design of
words coming to an end of a cycle, was this in fact
intentional? Could
Design have an ulterior motive, it was too clever,
too outspoken much
like the new i Books etc, it was of the heaving
intellect to choose what
is the essence the functionality of objects on the
outside, pared down
to immunise the mechanisation of society by
computer chip. Who had the
right to put things here and there as part of good
Design law. Design
seemed not academic, but intelligent with
simpleness. In this simpleness,
we could all participate thinking that we had all
done this ourselves
(areselves) even language language, took on a new
meaning. The logo was
followed by the colloqual text, bastardised, copied
and issued as common
service uniform for us the soldier of cool culture of
the text.
There are too many Films, TV programs that form
the monologue
of 'cool'!?!!!. What are we to do?
